Does Granulation Tissue Fall Off After Tooth Extraction, Intruder Mountainside Sniper Code Location, Saint Barnabas Island Caribbean Island, Kzok Radio Personalities, Why Did Michaela Pereira Leave Cnn, Articles N

Shadden, 290 Kan. at 817 (citing State v. Reid, 286 Kan. 494, 50709, 186 P.3d 713 [2008] ). Finally, Robinson contends that petit Juror 246 was exposed to similar misstatements of the law. One juror thought Juror 147 might have opened the Bible at one point and quoted from one of the verses in the jury room, but he was not confident about the accuracy of this fact. granted in part 135 S.Ct. Sheila told her sister, Cathy Norman, that she had met a man with a good job, that they planned to travel together, and that he planned to buy Debbie a new wheelchair and accessible van. Carr, 300 Kan. at 69. Because the statute does not vest defendant with any substantive right, it logically follows that suppression of evidence is not an individual remedy available to defendant. We find no error, particularly given the deference owed to the district judge's findings. Did the prosecutor improperly shift the burden of proof? We thus conclude it would be unacceptably speculative to presume their preliminary findings would be consistent with those produced in a final analysis. See State v. Carr, 300 Kan. 1, 12122, 331 P.3d 544 (2014) (no error in denial of challenge of jurors who said they would lean toward death upon conviction where balance of record reflected jurors' willingness to consider mitigation and both sentencing options), cert. See Carr, 300 Kan. at 121 (no error in denying challenge of allegedly mitigation-impaired jurors; selected passages from the questionnaire and voir dire responses of these [challenged] prospective jurors yield cause for concern, but they eventually professed understanding of and fidelity to the law). The legislature's 1976 amendment to K.S.A. These remarks did not affect Robinson's peremptory challenges or fair trial rights. The body of the message said Trouten and her dogs had left on the adventure of a lifetime. Remington responded a few minutes later, sharing that she had ended the relationship with her former BDS & M master. Remington received a reply from Trouten's Hotmail account, referring Remington to a new master at eruditemaster@email.com. Remington contacted this new master and began communicating with a man she came to know as Jim Turner. Also, he expressly informed jurors that the procedure was unrelated to any security threat or juror safety. See People v. Mincey, 2 Cal.4th 408, 46667, 6 Cal.Rptr.2d 822, 827 P.2d 388 (1992) (no prejudice where trial judge removed and questioned jurors promptly after learning juror had brought Bible into the jury room and provided curative instruction). She became so upset that the family arranged special contact visits, with the approval of sheriff's department personnel, while Robinson was in jail awaiting trial. But prosecutor Paul Morrison, on redirect, asked Nancy Robinson why she had failed to mention that fact in the two previous times she had spoken to authorities and during her testimony at the 2001 preliminary hearing. In January 1985, Robinson told Gaddis another organization, Hope House, had referred a young lady to his program, and he had placed her at a motel in Kansas. Robinson argues Judge Anderson improperly curtailed the scope of voir dire in four respects, each of which he characterizes as separate claims. The Tenth Circuit held the juror was excused improperly.