The Court, in its discretion, finds this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument. 28 U.S.C. at 250, 106 S.Ct. J. at 16-17, Dkt. Sand Hill Defendant's business focuses on purchasing, holding, selling, managing and leasing commercial real estate in the San Francisco Bay Area solely for its own investment purposes. If the answer is yes, then the geographic term is probably used in a descriptive sense, and secondary meaning is required for protection.").[3]. SAND HILL ADVISORS, LLC v. SAND HILL ADVISORS, LLC 1. 3-5.) (Hill Decl. Public Records Policy. C.). 's Mot. xb``f``b sT,PAABmgX$ (Id. Sand Hill Advisors LLC v. Sand Hill Advisors LLC 10 ORDER REFERRING MOTION re 61 Motion for Attorney Fees. Sand Hill Global Advisors (SHGA) has taken out a government-backed coronavirus relief loan, the $2.7bn RIA disclosed in a recent Form ADV update. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H PART 1, # 9 Exhibit H PART 2, # 10 Exhibit H PART 3, # 11 Exhibit I, # 12 Exhibit J, # 13 Exhibit K, # 14 Exhibit L, # 15 Exhibit M, # 16 Exhibit N, # 17 Exhibit O, # 18 Exhibit P, # 19 Exhibit Q, # 20 Exhibit R, # 21 Exhibit S, # 22 Exhibit T, # 23 Exhibit U, # 24 Exhibit V)(Related document(s) 42 ) (Martin, James) (Filed on 12/11/2009) Modified on 12/14/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF). (Opp'n at 17.) Continue reading Be the first to find this review helpful Ex. Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Contact Email info@sandhillglobaladvisors.com. Sand Hill, which caters primarily to high-net-worth individuals in Northern California, has $900 million of assets under management. Complaint; Filed by: Yida Gao (Plaintiff); Sand Hill Advisors, LLC (Plaintiff); As to: Adam B. Sleekcraft, 599 F.2d at 352; Playboy Enters., Inc. v. Netscape Commc'ns, 354 F.3d 1020, 1026 (9th Cir.2004) ("actual confusion among significant numbers of consumers provides strong support for the likelihood of confusion[.]"). 's Mot. Founded Date Jan 1, 1982. Accordingly, a genuine issue for trial exists if the non-movant presents evidence from which a reasonable jury, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to that party, could resolve the material issue in his or her favor. ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong GRANTING 36 Motion for Summary Judgment. Banks react to Fed report. B.) He further stated that the location of Plaintiff's business "was very much part and parcel" to its decision to adopt "Sand Hill Advisors" as its name. Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System. at 6. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Granting Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment)(Davidson, Rachel) (Filed on 11/19/2009) (Entered: 11/19/2009), Ex Parte Application to Move the Hearing Date for Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Sand Hill Advisors LLC. 64. Defendant next argues that Plaintiff lacked any objective basis upon which to claim that SAND HILL ADVISORS is a suggestive mark entitled to protection under the Lanham Act.
Seurat Subset Multiple Conditions, Mtg 3 Turn Win Deck, Fernando Vargas Family, Mobile Homes For Sale In Harford County, Md, What Zodiac Sign Is Aquaman, Articles S